I Can Choose To Abort, But Can’t Pick The Price Of My P*ssy
Written By Brook Lynne For BlogXilla.com
What’s the big deal with prostitution?
I only ask because I don’t know why I would ever concern myself with what one does with her body, or his money, or vice versa. But the age old double standard is: judge the prostitute, and not the customer. People either dislike prostitution because its one, illegal or two, socially frowned on. Whether you find them on a corner, a strip club or posing as a “real estate agent”, there is a sexual double standard for promiscuous women.
See, a woman being what the collective call a WHORE, is really only criminal when she charges for it. Otherwise, the peanut gallery doesn’t seem to bother with the occasional slut who sleeps around. But if she decides to profit off her escapades, then all of sudden its offensive. There is just something about putting a hefty price on your head for something that otherwise you would already be doing for free, that seems to rub prudes the absolute wrong way.
There are certain women out there who would like to place worth on their physical attributes, including but not limited to models, strippers, pageants etc. Although street walking is probably the most dangerous way to make a buck for a prostitute, a lot of women get their financial jollies from casual acquaintances at social gatherings who have it to spend, and she’s got it to give. Instead of having sex for free, they charge for the privilege. Yes, privilege. The crime should be giving it up for free, outside of a monogamous relationship, that is. This doesn’t bother me, and should not bother you. Seeing as most women are indirectly prostituting anyway, right? They’re a ton of women who go to clubs, basketball games and industry gatherings just to snatch up a deep pocket gentlemen, and either that night, or later on in the courtship, sleep with them, in hopes of wooing their pockets. Its safe to say that if these women who are looking for these “type” men are sleeping with them, then they’re looking for some kind of long term EVENTUAL security. So, while the prostitute may get the money tonight, the indirect prostitute is fucking to get the money in the long run. Which seems to be more of a gamble then the said “whore”.
In my opinion, if the man is willing to pay, and the woman is willing to lay down, then it seems as though to be a victimless crime. It would just be morally offensive to people who live by yesterdays social standards. Besides, sex is a free act that belongs to its owner, to charge for it, is the prerogative of the operator.
Women from all over in every profession are selling their pussy, soul, and first born to get to what we call the “american dream”. Whether its direct, or indirect, face it, sex sells, and women haven’t been using their sexuality to get what they want since forever (a promotion, money, homes, cars). Personally, even though I choose not to dabble in the sport of direct hooker-isms, I certainly do not think it should be considered a crime. Its a fair exchange between two consenting individuals who need a scratch itched.
A woman has the right to choose when it comes to aborting a child, but she doesn’t have the right to choose how much her pussy is worth?
You can follow Brook on twitter @Brookandthecity and also read her blogs daily on her website. AbsoluteBrook.com







